Researchers at Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) conducted a pilot study that shows that gamma-activation analysis (GAA) offers a much faster, more accurate way to detect gold than traditional chemical analysis methods.
This will mean mining companies can measure what's coming in and out of their processing plants with greater accuracy, allowing them to monitor process performance and recover small traces of gold - worth millions of dollars - that would otherwise be discarded.
According to project leader Dr James Tickner, the study showed that this method is two-to-three times more accurate than the standard industry technique 'fire assay', which requires samples to be heated up to 1200 degrees Celsius.
"The big challenge for this project was to push the sensitivity of GAA to detect gold at much lower levels - well below a threshold of one gram per tonne," he said.
More From This Section
"Our experience suggests that better process monitoring can help reduce this loss by about a third," he said.
Tickner said that the other major benefit of GAA is that it is easily automated, allowing for much quicker analysis of ore samples.
"Fire assay usually involves sending samples off to a central lab and waiting several days for the results. Using GAA we can do the analysis in a matter of minutes, allowing companies to respond much more quickly to the data they're collecting," said Tickner.
Another great advantage of GAA is that it is more sustainable - unlike fire assay it doesn't require the use of heavy metals such as lead.
It is also very adaptable, researchers said.
"While most of the work we've done has been based on the gold industry, the technique can be modified for other valuable commodities such as silver, lead, zinc, tin, copper and the platinum group metals," said Tickner.