At today's meeting, Prashant Patel, who had petitioned before the Commission seeking disqualification of the MLAs, opposed the plea of Congress and BJP of becoming a party to the case saying "they wanted to politicise the issue".
The Delhi government too opposed the plea of intervention by the BJP and the Congress. Rakesh Mehra, representing the Delhi government, said it should be made "impleader" as the AAP dispensation will have a direct impact on the decision by the EC in the matter.
Senior advocate and former External Affairs Minister Salman Khurshid, who is representing Congress, said their plea of intervention was also opposed by the 21 AAP MLAs.
"We feel in the public interest, the plea should be allowed. Our plea was opposed by the MLAs. The judgment on this is reserved," he told reporters.
More From This Section
"We told the Election Commission that the MLAs should face criminal prosecution because the 21 MLAs filed affidavits with false information and tried misleading it.
"The MLAs said that they haven't received any office, but RTI states that they have been given offices, furniture and vehicles under the direction of Delhi government. The EC has reserved the order and has said they will inform us about the next date accordingly," Vivek Garg, representing BJP, said.
Following the petition, EC had issued notices to the AAP MLAs last month.
The AAP government had appointed 21 parliamentary secretaries to assist its ministers. Subsequently, the city government sought to amend the Delhi Members of Legislative Assembly (Removal of Disqualification) Act, 1997, so as to exempt parliamentary secretaries from disqualification provisions in 'office of profit' cases.
However, the President refused to give his assent to the Bill.