Justice Vibhu Bhakru observed this while hearing a plea filed by Uttar Pradesh-resident Gudda, challenging the decision of insurance ombudsman in Delhi declining to hear his plea on the ground of jurisdiction.
The high court, however, said, "the principal office of the insurer is located in Delhi and, even if it is accepted that the concerned branch office is located in Noida, the ombudsman at Delhi still has the jurisdiction to entertain the complaint made by the petitioner".
"The counsel for the petitioner states that he would have no objection if the Ombudsman at Noida decides the complaint and if directions for time bound disposal of the complaint are issued," the court noted.
Gudda had filed a claim before the IFFCO Tokio General Insurance Company at Saket in South Delhi which was rejected. He again made the representation in November 2016, but the IFFCO did not respond.
Also Read
He had then approached the insurance ombudsman in Delhi from where his complaint was transferred to Noida saying he resided in Uttar Pradesh and Delhi has no jurisdiction.
The court agreed to their contention and held that it had merit.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content