This figure is very different from one given in 2012, when some scientists involved in the ENCODE (Encyclopedia of DNA Elements) project stated that 80 per cent of our genome has some biochemical function.
Many in the field have argued that the biochemical definition of 'function' was too broad - just because an activity on DNA occurs, it does not necessarily have a consequence; for functionality you need to demonstrate that an activity matters.
To reach their figure, the Oxford University group took advantage of the ability of evolution to discern which activities matter and which do not.
The researchers used a computational approach to compare the complete DNA sequences of various mammals, from mice, guinea pigs and rabbits to dogs, horses and humans.
More From This Section
The scientists' idea was to look at where insertions and deletions of chunks of DNA appeared in the mammals' genomes.
These could be expected to fall approximately randomly in the sequence - except where natural selection was acting to preserve functional DNA, where insertions and deletions would then lie further apart.
The rest of our genome is leftover evolutionary material, parts of the genome that have undergone losses or gains in the DNA code - often called 'junk' DNA.
"We tend to have the expectation that all of our DNA must be doing something. In reality, only a small part of it is," said Dr Chris Rands, first author of the study.
Not all of the 8.2 per cent is equally important, the researchers said.
A little over 1 per cent of human DNA accounts for the proteins that carry out almost all of the critical biological processes in the body.