Stating that the opposition cannot close its eyes and ears to what people write and talk, Leader of Opposition Narasingha Mishra of Congress said the news report indicated how the Speaker rejected the demand for a debate on the chitfund issue.
This prompted them to bring the privilege motion, as for maintaining dignity of the House, the Speaker's role is important, the Opposition said.
"He should not only be impartial, but also should appear to be impartial," Mishra observed while reading out the contents of the news report directed at the Speaker.
"Therefore, it appears that the BJD members can raise the chitfund issue in the assembly and not the opposition members," Mishra further said.
More From This Section
Speaker Pujari, however, said that he stands by his earlier ruling of not allowing a discussion on the chitfund issue as the matter is sub-judice. "There has been no violation of any rule or law by not allowing debate on the chitfund issue in the assembly. When a chargesheet is filed in the court of law, it is sub-judice," he said.
Mishra, however, said the opposition feels that withholding ruling for an indefinite period will not serve the purpose of raising the issue.
"If the ruling is given after transaction of all Bills in English language, it may not serve the purpose," he mentioned.
Congress Chief Whip Tara Prasad Bahinipati also raised an issue stating that Speaker Pujari had been accused of signing a fake caste certificate in the past. "He (Speaker) should not chair the proceeding unless he is cleared of charges," Bahinipati said.
Pujari, however, clarified that no investigation is pending against him in case of the forged caste certificate issue.