They had ordered to pull down the other block of the building complex stating that it is in precarious condition and there is every likely hood of danger to the lives of the by passers and Public.
After the collapse of the complex on June 28 last the Collector Kancheepuram initiated proceedings under section 133 of Cr.P.C. Informing that the standing structure, Block-A was in a precarious condition, was likely to fall and thereby cause injury to persons living or carrying on business in the neighborhood or passing by and therefore removal thereof was necessary.
In proceedings under 138 Cr.P.C., the Magistrate is required to take evidence as in a summons case. Chapter XX of the Criminal Procedure Code deals with the procedure to be adopted for the trial of summons cases by the Magistrate. Chapter XX Cr.P.C., consists of sections 251 to 259. Section 251 requires substance of accusation to be stated, the judge said.
This Court, without hesitation, would inform that the reading placed by the District Magistrate/ Collector on the orders of this Court totally are misconstrued.
Also Read
"A reading of the order of Collector dated 12.10.2015 shows that though much reliance has been placed on the Justice R.Regupathy Commission of Inquiry Report and the conclusions arrived by it, the Collector also has relied on reports of an Expert Committee from Indian Institute of Technology, Chennai, Anna University and on the field inspection conducted by the earlier District Collector along with PWD Planning & Development, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority and members of the Technical Expert Committee.
The Judge also directed to initiate proceedings a fresh by another Collector who the Government thinks appropriate to hold the proceedings.