Issuing notice to CBSE JS (Academics) Srivastava, Justice Biswanath Rath asked the officer to reply by July 3 as to why contempt proceedings should not be continued against him for "making scurrilous remarks over the court's order."
Srivastava allegedly had issued a press statement in New Delhi questioning the propriety of an order issued by Justice Rath directing the CBSE to re-evaluate the answer sheets of some aggrieved class XII students.
On going to the press and insulting the court verdict, Justice Rath observed: "Some officers are becoming too arrogant while dealing with court orders."
At least 22 students had approached the high court alleging discrepancies in the marks awarded to them in certain papers. Engaging experts, the board re-evaluated the papers to find out that marks awarded initially changed in at least 18 of the 51 papers re-evaluated.
The high court subsequently ordered re-evaluation of answer sheets of another 159 aggrieved students, whose results were also published in May this year.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content