Justice Manmohan, in his ruling, specified that the house need not be self-acquired or owned by the parents.
"As long as the parents have the legal possession of the property, they can evict their abusive adult children," the court said, adding that even the "courts have repeatedly acknowledged the right of senior citizens or parents to live peacefully and with dignity".
This is a major improvisation in a 2007 law that had left it to state governments to frame rules to protect the life and property of senior citizens.
The brothers had contended that the tribunal had exceeded its jurisdiction in passing the eviction order as there was no claim for maintenance and the relief was granted only on the allegations of physical assault, maltreatment, harassment and forceful ouster of their parents from the property.
Also Read
The alcoholic, whose services were terminated from Delhi Police, had said that even in cases of parental abuse, no eviction order could be passed under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act 2007.
directions to evict the adult children from the property was necessary in certain cases like the present one, to ensure a normal life for senior citizens.
The court found that the Delhi government's rules allowed a senior citizen to complain to district authorities to evict abusive children only from a self-acquired property, despite the fact that the Act makes no such distinction and gives protection to parents even in a rented accommodation.
The court, consequently, directed the Delhi government to amend its rules and formulate an action plan to protect the life and property of senior citizens.