The court made the observation while dismissing the defence of the convict that he was framed in the case as he had a fight with the parents of the rape survivor.
It set aside his appeal against the award of the jail term given by the trial court.
"No parent would stake the honour of their minor daughter and the family, to level such a serious accusation of rape against appellant, to settle the scores on account of such a trivial quarrel, particularly when their relations were cordial," Justice Sunil Gaur said in his judgement.
While asking the Tihar jail superintendent to apprise the convict Praveen about the fate of his appeal, the court said that it could not be believed that he was implicated because he had objected to defecation by the victim's siblings in front of his house.
Also Read
It said that the victim's testimony was consistent and stood "amply corroborated" from the evidence of her parents and the medical report.
"There is no material infirmity in the prosecution case, to justify granting of benefit of doubt to the appellant. In view of foregoing narration, I find no substance in this appeal and as such, it is dismissed," the court said.
The convict, who pleaded innocence, said that on the day of the incident, he was in hospital follwing an accident.
He had said that he was falsely implicated because he had objected to the defecation by the victim's siblings in front of his house which had led to a quarrel.
"On a bare perusal of the victim's medical report, I find that there is mention of brown scabbing on the face and chest of the prosecutrix and also an oval shape bite mark was found on her chest," it said.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content