"Firstly, there is no office as such. The post of the parliamentary secretary was created to aid and assist the minister he was deployed with. He was not to be given any remuneration, office space or transport," AAP's Kasturba Nagar MLA Madanlal, who is parliamentary secretary (vigilance) said.
A senior party functionary exuded confidence saying that there were no "pecuniary benefits" associated with the posts.
Madanlal said although there was no remuneration involved, a parliamentary secretary "may" be given a space in the office or could use official transport "only" for official work.
"The guidelines clearly state that the parliamentary secretary may be given office space or transport. I did not ask for any transport or any office. I have not received any kind of benefit. I have no power to pass any order. So how can this be termed as a Office of Profit," Madanlal added.
More From This Section
Through the Bill, which has been forwarded to the Centre by the LG, AAP attempted to bring "retrospective" exemptions for the parliamentary secretaries from provisions of disqualification provisions.
However, questions were raised over their appointment by the Opposition, following which the Election Commission sent them notice seeking their response on why their assembly membership should not be cancelled.
Importantly, Lt Governor Najeeb Jung recently said that the office of parliamentary secretary is defined as an "office of profit if one looks at the statutes of Delhi" and that as per the GNCT Act, the city can have only one parliamentary secretary attached to the office of the Chief Minister.