A division bench headed by Justice V M Kanade was hearing a writ petition, filed by a Jet Airways cabin crew head Sameet Rajani challenging the decision of passport authorities to issue him passport only for a year instead of 10 years stipulated in the Passport Act.
The judges asked the passport authorities to renew the passport of Rajani for 10 years instead of the one year period sanctioned earlier.
The passport should be renewed in accordance with the Passport Act rules, said the bench.
The passport authorities cannot put any restrictions on a passport holder on his visits abroad as this would be against the Constitution, the high court said while allowing his petition.
More From This Section
Rajani was embroiled in a criminal case in a magistrate court at suburban Mulund. He was facing charges under IPC sections 353 (using criminal force on a public servant from performing duty), 332 (voluntarily causing hurt to public servant), 337 (causing hurt by endangering lives of others) and 504 (Intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of the peace) read with section 34 (common intention).
The magistrate asked him to approach the passport authorities and Rajani followed suit. The passport authorities renewed his passport only for a year. Being aggrieved, he moved the Bombay High Court seeking the passport validity for 10 years instead of one year sanctioned earlier.
The high court bench today directed the Mulund Magistrate to decide Rajani's application for going abroad while asking the passport authorities to issue a passport to him for a period of 10 years.