Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva initially issued the direction for payment of February salary, saying "if work was taken from them (workers), they have to be paid".
The court, thereafter, ordered payment of an additional 25 per cent of the arrears of salaries of September 2016 to December 2016 after the DCW employees said they were facing shortage of funds to pay the school fees.
During arguments today, the office of the Lieutenant Governor (LG) opposed any further payments and wanted the court to wait for the report of a committee appointed to look into the legality of appointments made by DCW.
Central government standing counsel Anurag Ahluwalia, appearing for the LG's office, said the committee's report, which is likely to be ready by March 13, will have a solution to the entire problem.
More From This Section
Delhi government's standing counsel Rahul Mehra said the Secretary of Department of Women and Child Development (DWCD) should not be the Secretary of DCW, nor should she be a part of the committee set up by the LG, a point which DCW Chairperson Swati Maliwal has been raising in the past.
office had "raked up" the issue of irregular appointments in the state women's panel to sidetrack the payment of salaries to people hired to work on various women's helplines.
It had contended that people were engaged on short-term contracts for three months to ensure that its various helplines, programmes and cells for women in distress continue to function till the Delhi government sanctions staff for the purpose.
The LG's office had claimed in its affidavit that Maliwal had "no power or authority to arbitrarily, unilaterally, unauthorisedly engage or appoint employees" in DCW and should have approached the competent authority if more manpower was needed.