The apex court said that courts should not be a "mute spectator" to the attempts by the convicts to circumvent and escape undergoing the sentences awarded to them by disappearing after getting bail and action must be taken in such cases, including dismissal of the appeal.
"It seems to us that it is necessary for the Appellate Court which is confronted with the absence of the convict as well as his counsel, to immediately proceed against the persons who stood surety at the time when the convict was granted bail, as this may lead to his discovery and production in Court.
It said that peace, tranquillity and harmony in society will be reduced to a "chimera" if such convicts can circumvent the consequence of their conviction.
"We are convinced that the interests of society at large are being repeatedly sacrificed for the exaggerated, if not misplaced concern for what is fashionably termed as 'human rights' of convicts," it said.
More From This Section
The court said, "We reiterate that there is an alarming and sinister increase in instances where convicts have filed appeals apparently with a view to circumvent and escape undergoing the sentences awarded against them. The routine is to file an appeal, apply and get enlarged on bail or get exempted from surrender, and thereafter wilfully to become untraceable or unresponsive.
The criminal justice delivery system, the court said "is being held to ransom by convicts who disappeared after getting bail and who have developed the devious and dishonest practice of escaping punishment or sentence by filing appeals, obtaining bail or suspension of sentence and thereafter disappearing beyond the reach of the arms of the law.