However, the High Court said, before going into the "serious issue" it would like to examine the locus standi of the NGO which has filed the petition highlighting the exception in Section 375 of the IPC which states that sexual intercourse by a man with his own wife, the wife not being under fifteen years of age, is not rape.
"You cannot file a PIL in vacuum. What is the aim and objective of your NGO. What is the locus of this petition. This is a serious issue. File better affidavit," a bench of Chief Justice G Rohini and Justice R S Endlaw said while posting the matter for February 18.
The NGO, in its petition filed through advocate Lohitaksha Shukla, claimed that the exception to Section 375 of the IPC was to the extent that it grants immunity to a husband by raping his own wife, who is above age of 15 years, was unconstitutional.
Also Read
It said that even though the law made a distinction between married and unmarried woman in this case, the basis of distinction does not have any rational nexus with the object sought to be achieved by the law, which is to protect women from sexual assault.
The petition also stated that marital rape has been criminalised in almost all major common law jurisdictions throughout the world, including in United States, United Kingdom, South Africa and Canada.