The PIL filed by advocate Hari Chand Arora, seeking issuance of appropriate directions to the Union of India, States of Punjab and Haryana and the UT Chandigarh administration to set up an institution of Lokayukta for citizens of Chandigarh, came up for hearing before a bench comprising Justices Ajay Kumar Mittal and Amit Rawal.
The petitioner contended that while Punjab and Haryana has appointed the anti-corruption ombudsman, there is no provision for the appointment of Lokayuktafor Union Territories under the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act.
The petitioner alleged that in the absence of any anti- graft institution like the Lokayukta, the officers/public functionaries of UT of Chandigarh, who come on deputation from Punjab and Haryana, are having unbridled powers to act in arbitrary fashion, there being no system of checks and balances.
The institution of Lokayukta for UT Chandigarh is therefore, necessary, he contended.
After hearing the petitioner on the issue of maintainability of the PIL, the bench asked Rafeeza Hakeem, additional advocate general, Punjab, to be the amicus curiae or friend of the court in the matter.