"Judgement reserved," a bench of Acting Chief Justice Gita Mittal and Justice C Hari Shankar said after arguments on behalf of the Centre, the petitioner and the amicus curiae appointed by the court.
Petitioner Kush Kalra, in his plea, has alleged "institutionalised discrimination" against women for not being recruited in the TA, which is an organisation of volunteers who get military training in order to be mobilised for the country's defence in case of an emergency.
The government had taken the stand that women were not recruited in the TA infantry, but there was no bar besides this.
However, its lawyer could not answer a question regarding which were the positions in the TA where women were working.
More From This Section
In his plea, Kalra has contended that unlike the Indian armed forces, TA is not a profession, occupation or source of employment and meant for those who are already in civilian jobs.
The petitioner has contended that the "state has a duty to ensure that there is no discrimination practised by anyone in the country and non-recruitment of female candidates who are gainfully employed is against the spirit of the Constitution".
He has sought that the provisions of the Act which prohibit recruitment of women into the TA be either struck down or interpreted in such a manner that both sexes can join the organisation.