 "PNB challenges HC order allowing Kingfisher to be represented")
PNB in its plea has sought setting aside of the high court's August 28 order which had also stayed the bank's notice to the extent it threatened to hold the airlines and its guarantors United Breweries (Holdings) Ltd (UBHL) and Vijay Mallya as wilful defaulters in the event of no reply within seven days from August 21.
The court had said the operation of the default notice would not come into effect as PNB will have to give to the airline, within a week from August 28, the documents relied upon by it and Kingfisher was given two weeks time thereafter to respond.
More From This Section
In its appeal PNB said the airline had not disclosed that a similar plea of the carrier, against United Bank of India, was dismissed by a division bench of the Calcutta High Court on July 16.
It has also submitted that the airline's appeal against the Calcutta High Court's decision was dismissed by the Supreme Court on September 2.
"Set aside the impugned judgement and order dated August 28, 2014 passed by the single judge of the high court," the bank's petition has prayed.
The Delhi High Court in its August 28 order had held as "unacceptable" the bank's reasons for not allowing the airlines to be represented by lawyers in the proceedings initiated to decide whether the grounded carrier is a wilful defaulter for non-payment of dues and directed that two advocates be allowed to represent Kingfisher.