However, Namdhari has refuted all the allegation of the investigating agency before Additional Sessions Judge Vimal Kumar Yadav and said he is "innocent" and has been "falsely implicated".
After Delhi Police Crime Branch concluded its argument, Namdhari's counsel R S Malik began his submissions, saying there is no legal evidence against his client and the accused has no connection with the bullets recovered from the spot or from the bodies of the deceased brothers.
Also Read
Ponty and Hardeep, who allegedly had a property dispute, were killed in a shootout at a Chhattarpur farmhouse on November 17 last year.
During the course of arguments, the prosecution informed the court that the two brothers were not on talking terms as there was property dispute between them.
"The dispute was not resolved on November 16, 2012 night, so the planning was to take away the property by any means, in which the two brothers were killed," the prosecution said.
The prosecution narrated the sequence of events leading to the final act of murder and said Ponty and Namdhari had conspired to take over the farmhouse from Hardeep's possession.
It said Hardeep had arrived at the scene and when Ponty's men were opening the gate of the disputed property, Hardeep fired at him and also at Ponty, and in return Namdhari and his PSO Sachin Tyagi shot him.