Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva made the observation in response to the argument on behalf of some students, including former JNUSU president Kanhaiya Kumar, Umar Khalid and Anirban Bhattacharya, that JNU did not give them the due opportunity to defend themselves against the charge of indiscipline.
Apart from the three, 18 other students have moved the high court challenging Jawaharlal Nehru University's (JNU) order holding them guilty of indiscipline in connection with a controversial February 9 event.
The students have contended that not giving them due opportunity to defend themselves against the charge of indiscipline, violated the principles of natural justice.
The court, however, said a university has to maintain strict discipline amongst its students and where disciplinary proceedings are being held, "you cannot expect the same principles of natural justice as you see in a criminal case."
Also Read
It, thereafter, asked the lawyer for the students to show the rules that JNU had to follow while taking disciplinary action against its students.
He said that in the case of Umar, no such opportunity was given to him. He was not even informed about the charges against him and was only told that a high-level enquiry committee was looking into the February 9 incident where he has to appear to explain his role and defend himself, he said.
The students in their pleas have also challenged their punishment, which ranges from rustication for a few semesters to withdrawal of hostel facilities.
Kanhaiya, Khalid and Bhattacharya were earlier arrested in a sedition case in connection with the February 9 event on the campus against hanging of Parliament attack convict Afzal Guru during which anti-national slogans were allegedly raised. They are now out on bail.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content