In a set of instructions issued to the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha secretariats as well as secretariats of state legislatures, the Commission has noted that "in some cases, there has been delay in the issuance of such notification by the secretariat of the House".
The poll body said the information about conviction and the subsequent notification of disqualification should not take more than seven days each.
In its July 10, 2013, judgement, Supreme Court had struck down sub-section 4 of Section 8 of the Representation of the People Act, under which incumbent MPs, MLAs and MLCs can avoid disqualification till pendency of the appeal against conviction in a higher court.
As the SC verdict is the law of the land now, conviction of lawmakers in certain cases, including those relating to corruption, leads to their immediate disqualification as a member of any House of legislature.
More From This Section
It said the Chief Secretary of a state should ensure that secretariats of Lok Sabha, Rajya Sabha, state Assembly and state Council -- as be the case -- should be immediately informed of conviction of a member by any court.
The first disqualification from Parliament had come on October 21, 2013, after 66-year-old Rashid Masood, a Congress member of Rajya Sabha, was held guilty in a case of corruption and other offences in the month before.
RJD chief Lalu Prasad and JD(U) leader Jagdish Sharma were disqualified as Lok Sabha members on October 22, 2013, following their conviction in the fodder scam.
Seeking to negate the SC verdict, the then UPA government had brought a Bill in Parliament. However, following differences with the opposition, that Bill could not be passed. An ordinance on the lines of the Bill was later cleared by the Union Cabinet on September 24, 2013, to protect convicted lawmakers.
But this was reversed on October 2 that year by the Cabinet which decided to withdraw the Ordinance as well as the Bill in the wake of a public outburst against it by Congress Vice President Rahul Gandhi.