The court today reserved its order after hearing the arguments in which police said they had fulfilled all the requirements for imposing prohibitory order under section 144 of the CrPC during the protests by AAP members in front of the Prime Minister's residence and other places here last year.
During the hearing, advocate Prashant Bhushan, AAP member and an accused in the case, told the court that the imposition of CrPC section 144 was a "clear abuse of process by the police" and it was "designed to harass them".
"Arguments on the said aspect have been heard. Put up for order on March 25," Metropolitan Magistrate Jay Thareja said.
During the arguments, police faced tough time with the court asking it to explain as to why section 144 of the CrPC was imposed in the New Delhi area.
"Just because you (police) are saying that rulers are staying in that area so you can impose section 144 of the CrPC then I must say that I am bound by the Supreme Court order," the court asked after the police said the accused should raise this issue during the trial in the case.