"The PoIs (Points of Interconnect) have been provided well above the customer growth projection provided by Jio to Airtel. The capacity provided is ideal for serving over 190 million customers on the Jio network and is more than double of the 72.5 million total customers currently claimed by Jio," Bharti Airtel said in a statement.
Jio called the statement "malicious and misleading" adding that it is a a continuation of Airtel's "ongoing mischievous and motivated campaign to divert attention from its anti-competitive and anti-consumer actions and violations of license conditions which are being investigated by the Authorities".
Reliance Jio Infocom Ltd (RJIL) said the fact is that over 2.6 crore NLD (STD) calls are still failing daily amounting to 53.4 per cent call failure, as on January 31, 2017, as against TRAI norm of 0.5 per cent.
More From This Section
Jio said there has been no delay from its side in activating PoIs -- which is required for connecting calls between network of telecom operators.
Airtel slammed Jio's complaint on PoIs and said that it appears to be "aimed at covering up technical issues in their own network or their inability to activate the PoIs given" which was refuted by RJIL.
Airtel said that the capacity provided to RJIL is much more than comparable capacity provided by it to other firms.
"Vodafone with 202 million customers has been provided a total of approximately 40,600 PoIs by Airtel over a period of 21 years. Of these 23,950 PoIs are for incoming calls - much less than what has been provided to Jio," it said.
trying to prevent customers from enjoying benefits of superior service offered by a new operator, while misleading customers and causing reputational damage to RJIL by claiming that there are technical issues in RJIL network," RJIL said.
It added that India's telecom sector tends to progress due to disruptive innovation brought in by newcomers, but unfortunately, Airtel is trying to block such initiatives.
Airtel emphasised the "huge asymmetry in traffic" due to Jio's free offers has also resulted in "complete failure" of the present IUC (Interconnection Usage Charges) regime, which assumes nearly symmetric traffic while fixing the below cost termination charge.
RJIL replied that Airtel's insinuation that RJIL has not complied with telecom regulator Trai's tariff orders is bizarre and defamatory considering that the regulator categorically stated that RJIL's tariffs are compliant with the tariff orders of Trai and other applicable regulations.
On IUC allegations, RJIL said that Airtel's statement that IUC regime assumes symmetric traffic is "funny to say the least".
IUC is paid by one operator to other for connecting calls of their subscribers with customers outside their network.
"Further, Airtel's cry for higher IUC stems from the inability to retain customers by providing telecom services at cheaper cost. Seemingly, Airtel wants other operators to subsidise its operations," RJIL said.
It added that Airtel is once again trying to portray that it has done a favour by providing POIs to RJIL, whereas it may be noted that all operators have a mandatory and unconditional obligation under the license to provide adequate POIs to all the other operators.