A Division Bench of the High Court, headed by Justice Govind Mathur, set aside the order of the Central Excise and Sales Tax Appellant Tribunal while allowing the appeal of the central government which had opposed the claim of the company.
The court upheld the order of the Commissioner (Appeals), which had rejected the energy major's claim for refund of the cess.
Senior Standing Counsel for the Central Government and Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax Department, Vipul Singhvi, in his appeal against the Tribunal's order, argued that the Education Cess and Secondary Education Cess was first levied in 2004 and 2007 respectively under the Finance Act.
The counsels for the Cairn Energy India, on the other hand, argued that the provisions of Oil Industries Development Act are similar to the Sugar Cess Act and other cess and hence this Education Cess and Secondary Education Cess did not apply on the Oil Cess.
Contesting this argument, Singvi said the Oil Cess was not 'pari materia' (similar) to other cess applicable in the country and prayed for the rejection of the writ petition for refund by the energy major.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content