"They say the word was incorporated in the Preamble later. Question is not when the two words were incorporated, but whether it is part of the Constitution or not.
"I am surprised Rajnath can make such a nonsensical statement, especially in the wake of (his party's) drubbing in Bihar elections," Justice (retd.) Sachar said on the sidelines of an event here to mark Constitution Day.
Vajpeyi stated the word 'sarva dharma sambhav' would be a better replacement for "secularism" as it conveys respect for all the religions.
"In my opinion, it should not be either 'dharma nirpeksh' or 'panth nirpeksh'. Instead, we should use the word Gandhiji would use, 'sarva dharma samabhav', which is a better word, expressing respect for all the religions.
More From This Section
"Dharma nirpeksh has been in use and the ruling party has played a big role in dishonouring the word," Vajpeyi said on the sidelines of the event.
The winter session of Lok Sabha today began with an animated debate on the Constitution during which the government said the word 'secularism' mentioned in it had been "misused" while the opposition, led by Congress President Sonia Gandhi, raked up the issue of 'intolerance'.
Initiating discussion on 'Commitment to India's Constitution' as part of 125th birth anniversary of B R Ambedkar, Rajnath Singh said the architect of the Constitution had never thought of putting the term 'secularism' in the Preamble but it was incorporated through an amendment in 1976.