"A wife cannot keep mum for so long when there are such serious allegations against the husband. It was an unusual behaviour," Additional Sessions Judge Sanjiv Jain said while asking Farooqui's counsel to explain why she did not confront him about the allegations for over a month since the time she had exchanged emails with the complainant.
Concluding the final arguments, Farooqui's counsel said accused's wife and film-maker Anusha Rizvi had responded to the emails sent by the American woman in April 2015 as she could not reach her husband.
"Rizvi had responded to the e-mail as Farooqui had no access to his laptop at the rehabilitation centre and she had deleted mails from his account and transferred them to hers. She could not reach him as he was being treated at the centre.
Also Read
The counsel also argued in court that there was an inexplicable delay in lodging of FIR and refuted the American woman's claim that her research visa had expired and she had to wait for its renewal.
The court fixed the next date of hearing in February as the Delhi High Court is yet to decide an application moved by the complainant's lawyer Vrinda Grover seeking re-examination of one of the witnesses in the case.
The US native, during in-camera proceedings, had alleged that Farooqui had raped her at his Sukhdev Vihar residence here on March 28 last year and later apologised to her in several e-mails exchanged between them.
The court had started trial in the case after framing charges of rape under section 376 (rape) of IPC against him.
The police had on June 19 lodged an FIR against Farooqui on the complaint of the woman after which he was arrested. The charge sheet was filed against him on July 29.