Gandhi, who was addressing students at University of California, Berkeley, said around 2012 the Congress Party "stopped having conversations with people".
He said this could be a problem for any party which is in power for 10 years.
"The vision that we laid out in 2004 was designed at best for a 10-year period. And it was pretty clear that the vision that we laid out in 2004 by the time we arrived in 2010-11 was not working anymore," the 47-year-old leader said.
When asked if he wanted to take up an executive role in the Congress Party, he responded by saying, "I am absolutely ready to do that".
Also Read
"We have an organisational election process that decides that. And that process is currently ongoing. So we have an internal system where we elect certain delegates who make that decision. So for me to say that that decision is mine that wouldn't be very fair.
When asked whether the Congress party was more associated with dynastic politics, Gandhi argued that India is being run by dynasties.
"Most parties in India have that problem So...Mr Akhilesh Yadav is a dynast. Mr Stalin is a dynast... Even Abhishek Bachchhan is a dynast. So that's how India runs. So don't get after me because that's how they India is run. By the way, last, I recall, Mr Ambanis are running the business. That's also going on in Infosys. So that's what happens in India," he said.
"And I can name them in every state. There are also people who happen to have a father, or a grandmother or a great grandfather in politics. They do exist," he said.
"The real question is the person actually capable person is the person a sensitive person and that's the question," he said.
He also said the BJP is implementing most of the programmes initiated during the Congress' rule.
"The central architecture they borrowed from us. But that architecture does not work. Because we know it. It stopped working," he said.
"The idea of non-violence is what has allowed this huge mass of people to rise up together."
He also criticised Prime Minister Narendra Modi's foreign policies.
"Whereas I completely agree with their positioning as far as the (ties with) the US is concerned, I think they're making India vulnerable because, if you look at Nepal, the Chinese are there. If you look at Burma the Chinese are there. If you look at Sri Lanka, the Chinese are there. If you look at Maldives, the Chinese are there," he said.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content