The consumer commission, while granting full refund of cost of the flat to complainant Aruna Nanda, who had purchased it in 2010 but did not get the possession due to constantly changing offers by the builder, said Supertech had "no right" to unilaterally change the flat, its size and price without the consent of the homebuyer.
"After considering the rival submission I feel that complainant cannot be forced to accept possession after about seven years. There is no fault on the part of complainant. If Supertech had not been able to complete its project within time stipulated, it has to suffer and none else," the bench presided by Member O P Gupta said.
The builders had promised to hand over possession of the flat within 18 months and allotted it for a consideration of Rs 39.52 lakh and later demanded Rs 1,45,954 more, it said.
More From This Section
However, on November 12, 2010, Supertech transferred booking to another flat in a project Eco-3 in Greater Noida and the consideration was increased to Rs 41.68 lakh. It again changed the flat with an enhanced consideration of Rs 42.79 lakh, it said, adding that the area of these flats was less than the originally allotted one.
The builder had contended that it has invested lot of amount in the project and was not in a position to refund the amount due to slump in the market.
The commission, however, found Supertech deficient in service, saying "I find that Supertech is deficient in service. The complaint is allowed and Supertech is directed to refund Rs 40.98 lakh within three months.