The civil suit was filed in 1997 in which Satyarthi along with his wife Sumedha were named as defendants.
The court was apprised about the missing records by the receiver who was appointed to look into various key aspects of the dispute and file a report on it.
Receiver Rana Parveen Siddiqui told the court that some important records of Mukti Pratisthan Trust were missing, due to which she was facing difficulty in preparing her report.
When the court was informed about it, the judge said it would not be possible for the receiver to complete the entire report. She asked the plaintiffs, including another trustee Sheo Taj Singh, and defendants Satyarthi and Sumedha to inform the court about the place where the post-1987 records had been kept.
More From This Section
The court passed the direction while hearing the civil suit which alleged that the plaintiffs had come to know about embezzlement of huge sums of money belonging to the trust and expropriation of huge amounts by maintaining false accounts.
Satyarthi and his wife had earlier filed a statement challenging the maintainability of the suit and had also denied the allegations made in it.
They had alleged that the plaint filed against them was a proxy litigation which the plaintiffs have filed in "collusion with their mentor Swami Agnivesh a political figure and Arya Samaj leader who was putting pressure to grab the movable and immovable properties of the trust".