Justice Manmohan said it has been averred that the respondent (RTI applicant Vansh Sharad Gupta) never filed an RTI application in the prescribed form and the requisite fee.
It is also stated that the respondent did not file the first appeal and hence the second appeal could not have been entertained by the CIC, he noted.
"It is unfortunate that the petitioner did not take the initiative on his own to upload the latest amended bare Acts," Justice Manmohan said upholding the order of Information Commissioner Sridhar Acharyulu.
He said this Court also takes judicial notice of the fact that in challenging the imposition of costs of Rs.10,000/-, the Government of India would have spent more money in filing the present writ petition.
More From This Section
He said public can be expected to follow the law only if law is easily accessible "at the click of a button".
"In fact, as rightly pointed out by the CIC, the RTI Act itself mandates the Government to place the texts of enactments in public domain," he said.
The case relates to email of Vansh Sharad Gupta, a law student at National Law School of India University, to Law Ministry wanting to know e-mail ID of CPIO, Legislative department.