Terming as "malafide propaganda" AAP's allegation that Aiyar had to go because he opposed RIL's move to raise KG-D6 capital expenditure 2.5 times, the company said Aiyar left the oil ministry in January 2006 while the revised $ 8.8 billion field development plan was submitted in October 2006.
On allegations that Reddy was removed because he opposed higher gas prices for RIL, the company said, "It was Mr Jaipal Reddy (and not current Oil Minister M Veerappa Moily) who requested for the appointment of the Dr Rangarajan Committee in May 2012. It was on this committee's recommendations, the CCEA approved the revised gas prices (from April 2014)."
The Rangarajan Committee suggested that domestically produced gas should be priced at an average of global hub rates and the cost of importing liquid gas (LNG) into India.
According to this formula, the price of gas is being increased to about $ 8 per unit in April. The current rate of $ 4.205 per million British thermal units for gas from RIL's eastern offshore KG-D6 field expires on March 31.
"The prices had to be revised not because of the elections but because the prevailing price formula ceases to be valid with effect from April 1, 2014," RIL said in documents it released giving a detailed account of facts and arguments aimed at countering its critics.
On AAP's allegation that the price hike would result in a windfall of Rs 54,000 crore for RIL, the company said the new rates will raise the revenue earned on the country's entire gas production by Rs 26,000 crore.
"Of this increase, Rs 12,000 crore comes back to the government as royalty, profit petroleum, taxes and dividend. The share of RIL and its partners is only Rs 3,000 crore (not Rs 54,500 crore), which goes to meeting capital as well as operational costs before it can be counted as profit," it said.
Gas from KG-D6 barely makes up 15% of the nation's entire production of the fuel.
Responding to an allegation that the cost of KG-D6 gas production was less than $ 1 per mmBtu, the firm said, "The cost of production as alleged is nothing but post-production costs between the well-head and delivery point, which in 2009-10 was estimated as $ 0.89 per mmBtu for that year."
Apart from the post-production cost of $ 0.89, expenditure is incurred on discovery, appraisal, development production and maintenance, it said.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)