The prospect of no longer having to pay rent, known as imputed rent, is often cited as a major incentive to owning a home.
However, Isaac Tabner from the University of Stirling in the UK has argued that many buyers overlook costs included in their rent, such as building insurance and property maintenance.
He believes a failure to properly account for these outgoings can cause householders to overestimate the financial benefits of owning versus renting.
The new research provides a step-by-step explanation of how households can objectively compare the costs of renting versus buying a home, while taking their own personal circumstances and macro-economic conditions into account.
Also Read
In reviewing transaction costs, imputed rental yields, opportunity costs, inflation and the length of time owning a home, the study also shows that - during periods of deflation or zero inflation - people who rent are financially better-off than those who own their home.
However, increases in inflation and imputed rent, tip the balance in favour of ownership.
"It is often thought that buying a house makes more financial sense in the long run: however renting is frequently more worthwhile than buying for financially-constrained households, as well as households likely to relocate within 10 years," said Tabner.
The research charts how deflation or rising interest rates without a corresponding increase in wages, has the potential to impact negatively on homeowners.
By contrast, inflation - including wages - of two per cent per year, results in the same individual gaining 50 per cent of the present purchase value of their home if held for around 28 years.
The study was published in the journal International Review of Financial Analysis.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content