 "Return of ULIP era to hurt insurance industry: Reliance Life CEO")
As ULIPs or market-linked insurance plans make a big comeback, leading private sector life insurer Reliance Life's CEO Anup Rau said this reversal of trend would hurt the industry and the regulator is already looking into the matter.
Before the meltdown of 2008, ULIPs were very popular, including through large-scale misselling, but plunge in stock markets led to huge losses for investors as also for fund managers.
As markets gain momentum, investors are again being lured into investing in ULIPs but they may face the heat in case markets fall.
"After the 2008 meltdown, almost all companies swore not to sell ULIP products and stick to long term traditional products.
"However, with markets showing healthy gains, this trend is infact reversing. Unless the policies are bought with a long term horizon, when the cycle turns, we will see erosion in the AUM and a drop in persistency. This will also hurt the industry," Rau told PTI.
Asked whether the regulator needs to intervene so that there is no over-dependence on ULIPs, Rau said, "The regulator, IRDA, had introduced major changes in the ULIPs, sometime in 2010, making it more affordable for the investors.
"From the regulatory point of view, that's the best it can do. Some of the changes included cap of charges which restricts the cost to customer, minimum lock in for five years, ceiling on surrender charges, discontinuance fund concept, and capping the difference limit between charges in the five years.
"All this has made ULIPs relatively safer but the choice of taking or not taking ULIP is with the customer."
Rau said investors should first get adequate protection cover - usually 8-10 times their annual earnings - followed by long term savings options where ULIPs come in.
"However, ULIPs get sold as short term gain/investment products which pose a problem. For an insurer, the appropriate yardstick to measure the exposure to ULIPs should be the average vintage of the policies in the portfolio. However, a major chunk of business share from ULIPs in an insurers portfolio may not be good for the customers," he added.
Asked whether Reliance Life, as a major player, will take up the matter with IRDA with regard to growing dependence on ULIPs in the sector, Rau said, "I think IRDA is already sensitive to this growing trend".
"They have already defined guidelines and are monitoring these trends for appropriate actions," he added.
Before the meltdown of 2008, ULIPs were very popular, including through large-scale misselling, but plunge in stock markets led to huge losses for investors as also for fund managers.
As markets gain momentum, investors are again being lured into investing in ULIPs but they may face the heat in case markets fall.
More From This Section
Industry data shows that all companies, including LIC, selling purely traditional products have registered a decline in sales. On the other hand, ULIPs have been driving growth for some players including some large insurers and those promoted or supported by banks.
"After the 2008 meltdown, almost all companies swore not to sell ULIP products and stick to long term traditional products.
"However, with markets showing healthy gains, this trend is infact reversing. Unless the policies are bought with a long term horizon, when the cycle turns, we will see erosion in the AUM and a drop in persistency. This will also hurt the industry," Rau told PTI.
Asked whether the regulator needs to intervene so that there is no over-dependence on ULIPs, Rau said, "The regulator, IRDA, had introduced major changes in the ULIPs, sometime in 2010, making it more affordable for the investors.
"From the regulatory point of view, that's the best it can do. Some of the changes included cap of charges which restricts the cost to customer, minimum lock in for five years, ceiling on surrender charges, discontinuance fund concept, and capping the difference limit between charges in the five years.
"All this has made ULIPs relatively safer but the choice of taking or not taking ULIP is with the customer."
Rau said investors should first get adequate protection cover - usually 8-10 times their annual earnings - followed by long term savings options where ULIPs come in.
"However, ULIPs get sold as short term gain/investment products which pose a problem. For an insurer, the appropriate yardstick to measure the exposure to ULIPs should be the average vintage of the policies in the portfolio. However, a major chunk of business share from ULIPs in an insurers portfolio may not be good for the customers," he added.
Asked whether Reliance Life, as a major player, will take up the matter with IRDA with regard to growing dependence on ULIPs in the sector, Rau said, "I think IRDA is already sensitive to this growing trend".
"They have already defined guidelines and are monitoring these trends for appropriate actions," he added.