While RSS leader Dattatreya Hosabale said the Hindutva outfit would support the decision taken by the 'Dharam Sansad,' which organised the Ram Janambhumi movement, VHP chief Pravin Togadia said 'Ram Janmabhumi Nyas' and his organisation has always maintained that the disputed land belonged to 'Bhagwan Ram' and there should be a grand Rama temple there.
"It (the Ram temple issue) is to be decided by the Dharam Sansad as they are the people who organised the entire Ram Janambhumi movement and are also the parties who went to the court.
RSS Prachar Pramukh Manmohan Vaidya said a Ram temple at Ayodhya should be built either through dialogue or through a legislation.
"The Ram temple should be constructed either through a dialogue process or a legislation," he told PTI.
Also Read
The Supreme Court today said the Ayodhya dispute is a sensitive and sentimental issue and asked all parties concerned to sit together to find a solution to the tangle.
The observations came after BJP leader Subramanian Swamy mentioned the matter before the bench seeking an urgent hearing, saying that it has been over six years and the matter needed to be heard at the earliest.
VHP chief Togadia too batted for a law to facilitate the building of a Lord Rama temple at Ayodhya.
"The Union government must bring and pass the law to build the Ram Temple in Ayodhya at the birth place of Shreeram (Lord Ram)," Togadia said.
When the VHP submitted all proofs of a temple being there, the Babri Action Committee abandoned that meeting, he alleged.
"With Georadar and excavation by ASI under (supervision) of the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad high court, it has already been proved that there was a grand temple at the site of Babri structure. The Lucknow bench of high court has accepted that there are enough proof of the existence of the temple on the site of Babri structure," he said.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content