"Every set rules and due diligence were followed. Selection committee for the award has given its recommendation purely on the basis of merit and there was no malafide intention involved," Additional Solicitor General Sanjay Jain, appearing for Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports, told a bench of Justice Rajiv Sahai Endlaw.
The bench was hearing a plea of former wrestling coach Vinod Kumar, who was not considered for the prestigious Dronacharya Award 2015.
Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) had sacked Vinod as chief national coach in May this year after his performance as mentor was allegedly found to be inadequate during the Doha Asian Championship.
Appearing for Kumar, advocate Rahul Mehra contended that if the marks of candidates were considered by the selection committee of the award, then he was way ahead from other aspirants.
Also Read
He said that Kumar was earlier conferred with Dhyan Chand Award and there was no provision showing that a person considered for one prize cannot be considered for others. Rather it advances his chances for other awards, he added.
The bench after hearing the arguments reserved its order and asked the parties to file written submissions.
The division bench had given a green signal to the
Observing that the matter be disposed expeditiously, it had said that in the event of Vinod Kumar succeding in his case, the Sports Ministry will take appropriate steps in terms of the order, including conferment of the award.