The actor's lawyer Ashok Mundargi pleaded that both matters--revision application against the magisterial court invoking the charge of culpable homicide and retrial ordered by him in the 2002 case--be clubbed and heard by the same judge.
Additional Public Prosecutor Nazirali H Shaikh said he had no objection to the matters being clubbed together.
Accordingly, A N Patil, Additional Sessions Judge, referred the application filed by Salman for clubbing the two matters to the Principal Judge for a decision on the issue. It would come up for hearing on March 11.
In keeping with the directive of a Bandra magistrate, who invoked the charge of culpable homicide, Salman has to appear before the sessions court March 11. He may either appear on that day or urge for exemption, which he has not sought so far.
More From This Section
In his appeal, the actor argued that the magistrate had erred in invoking the charge of 'culpable homicide not amounting to murder' (section 304 part II IPC) in the hit-and-run case of 2002, terming it as "bad in law". The offence under this section is triable by a sessions court.
After examining 17 witnesses, the magistrate had come to the conclusion that culpable homicide charge was made out against the actor and transferred the case to the sessions court for retrial.
Salman's lawyer argued that the magistrate's order was "erroneous, bad in law and contrary to evidence on record".
He said the magistrate had failed to appreciate that he (Salman) had neither the intention (to kill people) nor the knowledge that his rash and negligent driving would kill a person and cause injury to four others.