The apex court directed that the Centre should apprise it about the issue in two days.
"Tell us in two days whether you will comply with the policy or not or we will pass an appropriate order fixing the accountability," a bench comprising Chief Justice T S Thakur and justices R Banumathi and U U Lalit said while posting the matter for Friday.
Under the government's Route Dispersal Guidelines, Category-I routes are the busy routes connecting major metros like Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata, Hyderabad, Bengaluru and Chennai, while Category-II are those in remote and difficult parts of the country, including Jammu and Kashmir, northeast states and the island territories.
"Where there is risk, we will not ask you to do it. You come out with some concrete solutions on the issue and also examine how do the airline satisfy the 10 per cent criteria," the bench said.
Also Read
To this the bench asked the ASG how Delhi-Srinagar route was different from Delhi-Patna, Delhi-Hyderabad or Delhi- Kolkata.
ASG Patwalia replied that earlier no operator wished to fly to difficult areas but now things have changed.
ASG Patwalia further said that it has been found by DGCA that ATR-72 was not feasible and is dangerous for Jubbarhatti airport and the air plane has never landed there since the airport was commissioned.
It had further said that according to the Route Dispersal Guidelines, every commercial airline is required to deploy in the northeastern region, Jammu & Kashmir, Andaman & Nicobar Islands and Lakshadweep (Category- II routes) at least 10 per cent of its deployed capacity on busy trunk routes (Category-I routes).
While ATR-42 turbo-prop planes generally have a capacity of carrying 35-42 passengers, it is between 60-75 for ATR-72s.