A bench comprising Chief Justice T S Thakur and Justices Ranjan Gogoi and A K Sikri also said that it may consider appointing a "receiver" of properties if the group finds itself unable to sell them to pay back dues to the investors.
"If you (Sahara Group) are unable to sell properties, then the court would be comfortable to appoint a receiver," the bench said, adding it also did not want to keep a person in jail.
At the outset, Sibal said the group has deposited the money in pursuance of an earlier direction and filed a fresh re-payment plan to the court which asked senior advocate Arvind Datar, appearing for SEBI, and another senior advocate Shekhar Naphade, the amicus curiae, to file their response.
The bench said the case, which is pending since 2012, has a "history" and asked SEBI and the amicus curiae to respond to the question as to whether the group is entitled to any further benefit in its re-payment schedule.
Also Read
"I have deposited Rs 1,200 crore after that," Sibal said, adding, "Rs 11,000-odd crore has been deposited and around Rs 11,036 crore is remaining".
Sibal, however, said as per SEBI, the dues are to the tune of Rs 14,000 crore.
At the fag end of hearing, the bench refused to entertain
pleas of individual litigants, who have either invested in Sahara properties or in other schemes, to move civil court or appropriate forum with respective pleas.
Datar, appearing for SEBI, had earlier said that Sahara Group was liable to pay Rs 37,000 crore with interest to SEBI, of which the principal amount payable was Rs 24,000 crore.
Till now, Sahara has paid Rs 10,918 crore out of Rs 24,029 crore raised from investors, he had said.
Earlier, Sahara Group had told the court that it would deposit Rs 200 crore, due on October 24, before time with SEBI in pursuance of an earlier order.
The court had on September 28 asked Sahara to deposit another Rs 200 crore by October 24 while extending the interim order releasing Roy and two other directors on parole.