The court categorically said that the interim applications for modification of the December 15, 2016 order were not proper as no application before it has stated that which areas on national and state highways were prone to accident.
It said the verdict has specifically mentioned that drunken driving on such stretches have resulted in fatality.
"We are very conciously thinking what we should do. We are keeping the hearing for tomorrow. Let us be very clear. What we understand in law, the IAs (interim applications) are not proper but the issue is serious, therefore we cannot be shutting our eyes," the bench, also comprising Justices D Y Chandrachud and L N Rao, said.
More From This Section
During the hearing, Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi said that two high courts -- Madras and Punjab and Haryana -- had said that highways mean not only the national but also the state ones due to which liquor vends along highways across the country were on the verge of shutting down on March 31.
He said the state highways across the country "criss-cross" through small towns and almost every district of a state and "if you will take 500 metres as a universial barrier" it will create problems in various states.
"If they are removed from commercial area then they would enter residential areas," he said, adding that "sale of liquor, which is a major source of revenue for the states, will take a huge toll".