The apex court, which took note of the "peaceful" holding of the first phase of the a single common entrance test through NEET (National Eligibility Entrance Test" on May 1, said "there was no urgency" in passing the order on the fresh pleas and would give the decision after hearing all the stake holders.
Before commencing the hearing, the top court asked the Centre and CBSE to provide it with the data about the number of candidates appearing in the first phase of the NEET from each state.
It also took note of the contention raised by various state governments about the language issue, i.E. Use of vernacular languages by asking Gujarat Government to place before it the question papers of last two years.
Also Read
Jammu and Kashmir government cited constitutional provision of Article 370 read with Article 35 A and section 6 of the J&K constitution to contend that it is the state which is entitled to conduct the test and the students cannot be admitted to these courses from outside the state through NEET.
Further, on the educational aspect, only the state government has the legislative competence and Centre cannot interfere in it.
College Association, Christian Medical College, Vellore and Christian Medical College, Ludhiana along with Tamil Nadu Government seeking exemption from the NEET citing various reasons.
Senior advocate K K Venugopal said that the entrance exam in Karnataka is designed to cater to the rural masses and private agency like TCS has been engaged for smoothly conducting the exams at 154 centres across the country and the candidates have been charged Rs 1000 for it.
The submission evoked a reaction from the bench which said "so many states are conducting separate tests and they must be demanding separate fees".
Senior advocate L Nageshwar Rao sought exemption for CMC Vellore from NEET saying that the minority character of the institution has to be kept in mind so that there should not any compromise with its autonomy and the same argument was taken by CMC Ludhiana with its counsel saying that it has unique system of entrance in which special paper is on "Bible" to identify the Christian minority.
Rao also argued for Tamil Nadu government contending that the NEET cannot be imposed as the state law for reserving 85 per cent seats and the admission through the marks of class XII has been validated by the Madras High Court.
The states, opposing NEET, alleged that there are marked differences in syllabus for the state entrance tests and the NEET.
Additional Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for Gujarat, said the state "per se" was not against the NEET but would be "tragic" for the students, preparing for the state tests, will have to take up NEET in such a short span of time.
The similar plea was raised by the counsel for states like Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu and few others.
medical colleges from conducting their tests and said that it would pass order after hearing all the parties.
During the hearing, Additional Solicitor General Pinky Anand, appearing for the CBSE, said that the first phase of NEET was conducted without any glitch and around 6.5 lakh students took up the test.
Yesterday, the bench headed by the CJI had said that the fresh pleas of states and private medical colleges for permission to hold their separate tests would be heard today.
The apex court had on April 29, said that the entrance test for admission to MBBS and BDS courses for the academic year 2016-17 will be held as per the schedule through the two-phased common entrance test NEET on May 1 and July 24.
The apex court order had implied that all government colleges, deemed universities and private medical colleges would be covered under NEET and those examinations which have already taken place or slated to be conducted separately stand scrapped.
It had also revived the government's December 21, 2010 notification for holding a single common entrance test through NEET with a clarification that any challenge on the issue would directly come before it and no high court can interfere.