Sonu Sardar, whose mercy petition was rejected by the President, was given an open hearing in accordance with the September 2 verdict of the five-judge Constitution Bench which had held that a limited oral hearing even at the review stage is mandated by Article 21 in all death sentence cases.
A three-judge bench headed by Justice A R Dave said "the review petition will be considered only to the extent of the sentence part".
The bench issued notice while seeking response from the Chhattisgarh Government and posted the matter for hearing on November 12.
The state government's standing counsel Atul Jha also raised objection to the submission of Sardar's counsel that the conviction should be relooked.
More From This Section
Ramachandran's submission that proper legal assistance was not provided to the apex court during the hearing of the appeal as advocate was from the Supreme Court Legal Aid did not go well with the bench.
"I am sorry to say this and I am anguished to say this. Don't blame Supreme Court if legal assistance was not rendered properly. I request senior advocates to sit and examine how matters are argued. It is not for us judges but for institution," Justice Chelameswar said.
While disagreeing with Ramachandran that the entire matter has to be looked into, the bench said "we have seen the entire thing and we have seen that conviction part has been well considered in the judgement".
The Chhattisgarh High Court and the Supreme Court had confirmed it on March 8, 2010 and February 23, 2012 respectively. The Supreme Court had thereafter on June 19 stayed execution of his death sentence.
The President had rejected his mercy plea on April 21 this year.