A bench of Justices S A Bobde and L Nageswara Rao allowed the appeal of the husband against Calcutta High Court's 2012 order dismissing his divorce petition, while considering that his wife was not interested in living with him as she never appeared before any court during the proceedings.
"Refusal to participate in proceeding for divorce and forcing the appellant (husband) to stay in a dead marriage would itself constitute mental cruelty," the bench said.
The apex court set aside the high court order in order to do "complete justice" and invoked its power under Article 142 of the Constitution to grant divorce.
"In the peculiar facts of this case and in order to do complete justice between the parties, we allow the appeal in exercise of our power under Article 142 of the Constitution," the bench said.
Also Read
In 2005, the husband moved a divorce petition in a district court alleging that the woman behaved inappropriately and had no respect for his ailing father.
He had alleged that she had deserted him, taken away the child and threatened to file criminal cases against him if he sought divorce. The woman, however, had denied the allegations and sought dismissal of the divorce petition.
A West Bengal district court had dismissed the plea in 2009, which was upheld by the Calcutta High Court in 2012.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content