"I'm yet to speak to legal experts, I don't know about the order. I will speak to our advocates and react later," he told reporters in Bidar in north Karnataka.
To a question on Tamil Nadu's arguments against utilising Cauvery river water for Bengaluru, he said, "Drinking water is a priority. It is a priority according to to our water policy also. If they (Tamil Nadu) say don't give water, it will not become a law or an order."
According to official sources, the cabinet meeting which is scheduled for tomorrow, will discuss the Supreme Court directions and the future course of action.
The Supreme Court bench comprising Justices Dipak Misra and U U Lalit today directed Karnataka to release 6,000 cusecs water to Tamil Nadu for three days, despite the resolution passed by the state legislature last week to use the water only for drinking purpose.
More From This Section
A special session of the legislature had on Friday adopted a unanimous resolution to use the water only to meet drinking water needs and not to provide it for any other purpose.
Following the apex court's fresh directions, sporadic protests erupted in Mandya, Mysuru and nearby areas.
Mandya Zilla Raitha Hitharakshana Samiti (MZRHS), at the forefront of Cauvery agitation, said there was no change in its stand that water should not be released to Tamil Nadu.
Police, as a precautionary measure, have made elaborate security arrangements in Cauvery basin areas, especially Mandya and Bengaluru.
Bengaluru city has been placed under prohibitoryorders under Section 144 of CrPC.
Calling the Supreme Court's direction to Karnataka to release 18,000 cusecs of water for three days as "grossly unfair" and "unfortunate", state BJP president B S Yeddyurappasaid the party will stand by any decision taken by the Siddaramaiahgovernment in the interest of the farmers and the people.
"The apex court asked the Attorney General whether itis possible for the intervention of the Union government in this issue. The AG sought time to reply to this question. Atno point in time, the apex court mentioned about the intervention of the Prime Minister," he added.