The apex court, which directed him to clearly comply with its May 12, 2011 order, said the amended petition should have the tenor of its direction and he should delete the statements casting personal allegations on Modi.
"You added much more instead of deleting. Your amendment should be in tenor with the order of this court. It cannot be like this," a bench comprising justices Ranjana Prakash Desai and N V Ramana said, while taking strong objection to Sharma's amended petition in which he mentioned the incidents of alleged snooping purportedly done at the behest of Amit Shah, the former home minister of Gujarat and Modi's close aide.
The bench brushed aside the arguments of Sharma's counsel that when the May 12, 2011 order was passed there was no whisper of statement about the father asking the authorities in Gujarat to keep her daughter under survelliance.
The bench, which directed Sharma to place by August 12 the amended petition containing averments in tabular form to show that he has deleted the objectionable paragraphs, said he cannot raise the issue of alleged survelliance done on him and the woman for supporting his plea for transfer of five criminal cases outside Gujarat.
"We do not understand the propriety for which you are bringing these allegations. For what purpose you are bringing the statements of survelliance we do not know," the bench observed while disapproving the action of filing amendment petition by adding controversial issues.