A bench of justices H L Gokhale and J Chelameswar also raised question on how she overruled objections of secretaries on land deal and gave permission without giving any reason. It said the minister "failed to pay respect" to the mandate of the legislature which represents the people.
"She has simply brushed aside the objections of the secretaries merely because the Chief Minister's secretary had written a letter, and because she was the minister concerned. While overruling the opinion of secretaries to the concerned department, the Minister was expected to give some reasons in support of the view she was taking.
It observed that Revenue Secretary and the Chief Secretary had placed the statutory provisions on record and it was also expected of the Government and the Minister to take cognizance of apprehensions of farmers as well as the statutory provisions brought to her notice.
The controversy was around 40 acre agricultural land in Kutch district which were purchased by one Indigold Refinery Limited of Mumbai, for industrial purpose but it failed to set up the project within the stipulated three-year period.
Also Read
The Revenue Minister allowed the re-sale of the land despite objections raised by Secretaries.
A PIL was filed in Gujarat High Court against the government order but it was dismissed by the court.
The petitioner then approached the Supreme Court which set aside the HC order but allowed Alumina Refinery to continue with the project on payment of Rs 3.15 crores to state government within three months.