Don’t miss the latest developments in business and finance.

SC rebukes Rahul Gandhi, closes contempt case against his 'chowkidar' remarks

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Nov 14 2019 | 5:00 PM IST

The Supreme Court Thursday rebuked Congress leader Rahul Gandhi for wrongly attributing to the apex court his "chowkidar chor hai" remark against Prime Minister Narendra Modi in connection with the Rafale case, but closed the contempt proceedings against him with a "word of caution" that he must be more careful in future.

It was "unfortunate" that Gandhi did not "verify" and made repeated statements in this regard as if the top court had given an approval to his allegations against the Prime Minister, the apex court held.

However, it was "far from the truth" and persons holding such important positions in the "political spectrum" must be more careful, it said while dealing with the criminal contempt petition filed by BJP MP Meenakshi Lekhi against Gandhi, who was then the Congress Party's President.

A bench, comprising Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justices S K Kaul and K M Joseph, said the matter was "compounded" by the Congress leader by filing a 20-page affidavit with a large number of documents annexed, rather than "simply accepting the mistake and giving an unconditional apology".

It however closed the contempt proceedings against him by taking into account the additional affidavit filed by Gandhi in which he had tendered an unconditional apology and said that the attributions were entirely unintentional, non-willful and inadvertent.

"We must note that it is unfortunate that without verification or even perusing as to what is the order passed, the contemnor (Gandhi) deemed it appropriate to make statements as if this court had given an imprimatur to his allegations against the Prime Minister, which was far from the truth," said Justice Kaul, who penned the verdict for the CJI and himself.

"This was not one sentence or a one off observation but a repeated statement in different manners conveying the same. No doubt the contemnor should have been far more careful," the bench said.

More From This Section

Justice Joseph, who wrote a separate but concurring verdict and dismissed the review petitions filed in the Rafale case, agreed with the view of Justice Kaul.

Referring to the May 5 additional affidavit in which Gandhi had tendered an unconditional apology, the bench said "better wisdom dawned" on his counsel only during the course of arguments and a subsequent affidavit was filed stating that he held the apex court in the highest esteem and respect and never intended to interfere with the process of administration of justice.

"We do believe that persons holding such important positions in the political spectrum must be more careful. As to what should be his campaign line is for a political person to consider," it said.

"However, this court or for that matter no court should be dragged into this political discourse valid or invalid, while attributing aspects to the court which had never been held by the court," the bench said, adding, "Certainly Mr Gandhi needs to be more careful in future."
It further said, "However, in view of the subsequent affidavit, better sense having prevailed, we would not like to continue these proceedings further and, thus, close the contempt proceedings with a word of caution for the contemnor to be more careful in future."
In its judgement, the top court noted, "The Supreme Court was also attributed to having held in consonance with what his discourse was, i.e., that the Prime Minister of India stole money from the Air Force and gave it to Mr Anil Ambani and that the Supreme Court had admitted that Mr Modi had indulged in corruption. It was stated that the Supreme Court had said that the chowkidar is a thief."

Also Read

First Published: Nov 14 2019 | 5:00 PM IST

Next Story