The Court's stand came during a hearing on a PIL filed against posting IPS officer Archana Ramasundaram as as CBI's Additional Director without following proper procedure of getting the consent of Tamil Nadu government, to whose police force she belongs.
The bench headed by Chief Justice R M Lodha was of the view that rules require concurrence of the state government and every action has to be taken by taking into account the federal structure.
Attroney General Mukul Rohatgi said, "I am trying to sort out and even advised that one way out is she goes out (as Additional Director), and gets empanelled on DG rank".
The court made made it clear that it was not withdrawing its May 9 order restraining her from discharging duty as Additional Director in CBI.
Also Read
Rohatgi's statement came when the bench, also comprising justices Kurian Joseph and R F Nariman, asked him to take a "position" as there were alleged "legal flaws" on her appointment and "the officer has been sandwiched between the Centre and the state government".
It granted time till October 14 to the Centre to spell out its stand to sort out the issue of appointment.
"At least you have realised hurdles coming in your way," the bench told Rohatgi after an hour-and-half long hearing.
The bench said because of legal flaws the appointment of Ramasundaram "is non est in the eyes of law" as the "required process of joining was not followed" and the "position" maintained by the apex court in its May 9 order "still holds the field".
Ramasundaram, a 1980 batch officer of Tamil Nadu cadre, had served in the CBI as Deputy Inspector General and later as its first woman Joint Director and handled various cases pertaining to Economic Offences between 1999 and 2006.
The court was hearing a petition filed by journalist Vineet Narain who had submitted that her appointment was arbitrary as an apex court's verdict was disregarded.