The court did so while refusing to relax its October 9 order banning the sale of firecrackers in Delhi and the National Capital Region(NCR) till October 31. Diwali falls on October 19.
The traders had moved the top court seeking relaxation of the ban, saying that a huge amount of money has been invested by them after their licences were revived and the latest order would cause massive loss to them. They sought permission of the apex court to sell crackers for at least a day or two before Diwali.
It said Diwali would not be "cracker-free" in Delhi-NCR as people would burst the firecrackers which they had purchased before the ban order.
During the hearing, advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for one of the parties, referred to certain statements made by some political leaders after the court's October 9 order.
More From This Section
"Do not make it political. We are pained to hear that some people tried to give it a communal colour. We are pained. It is sad," the bench said.
When Bhushan said some statements have been made that people would buy firecrackers from outside the Delhi-NCR and this would defeat the whole object of the order passed by the top court, the bench said, "this is an anguish expressed on our order".
The court said its ban order for this year during Diwali was an experiment to examine its effect on the pollution level in the region.
He also suggested that the court could restrict the timings for bursting firecrackers or its sale.
Rohatgi said that pursuant to the apex court's September 12 order temporarily lifting the stay and permitting sale of firecrackers in Delhi-NCR, traders had got licences and invested money in it as well.
"Diwali is a festival which is being celebrated since long. Delhi is not an exception. The problem of pollution is everywhere. There are number of children and persons who want to celebrate Diwali," he said while seeking relaxation on the ban order.
The other advocates, seeking a relaxation on the ban, said the firecracker industry was highly regulated and thousands of people employed in it, besides Diwali was a cultural event irrespective of the community.
"This would be against the very spirit of the order," the court said.
Some of the licencees told the bench that licences granted to them would expire on October 21 while the ban order would be in force till October 31.
The bench said they can make a request to the authorities to extend the period of licence beyond November 1, when the September 12 order of the apex court would come into effect.
However, advocate Gopal Shankarnarayanan, appearing for petitioner Arjun Gopal on whose plea the ban order was passed, said the court should not give any clarification as its order was clear.
When a counsel raked up the issue that Diwali was celebrated by all communities, the bench said, "we are not entering into this debate. Our order was not influenced by all that."
The court also asked the Delhi Police to implement its order banning sale of firecrackers.
It had said its November 11, 2016 order suspending the licences "should be given one chance to test itself" to see if there is a positive effect of this, particularly during Diwali.