The issue of voluntary passive euthanasia was debated extensively before the Supreme Court which today reserved its order on it.
A bench headed by Chief Justice P Sathasivam heard a PIL on allowing a person not to continue with artificial medical support, with the Centre vociferously opposing it and terming it as "suicide" which could not be allowed in the country.
The PIL filed by NGO "Common Cause" contended that when a medical expert opines that the person afflicted with terminal disease has reached a point of no return, then he should be given the right to refuse being put on life support system as otherwise it woould only prolong his agony.
Opposing the plea of the petitioner, Additional Solicitor General Siddharth Luthra submitted that it cannot be permitted in Indian society and it would be against the law and medical ethics.
More From This Section
"There does not arise any question of allowing a physician to take away the life of a patient. Duty of a physician is to protect the life and not to take away the life," Luthra said.
He said prayer made in the PIL is not tenable in law and it cannot be allowed through judicial exercise.
The petitioner contended that a person whose life was ebbing out should be allowed to die as the continuance of the life with the support system was an unnatural extension of the natural life span.