A bench comprising Chief Justice J S Khehar and Justice D Y Chandrachud said the issue raised by the petitioner has already been "fully adjudicated upon" by the court earlier and there was "no justifiation" in entertaining another plea.
"While dismissing the petition, we restrain the petitioner from filing any other petition in this court on the same cause. In case he wishes to file any petition, he shall have the liberty to do so and it would be subject to him enclosing a DD of Rs 50,000 along with the plea. If the plea will not be entertained by the court, the amount will be forfeited," the bench said.
"In the situation, we would have imposed exemplary cost but during the course of the hearing, we have observed the demeanour of the petitioner. We are of the view that petitioner is an innocent individual and is pursuing a cause which is close to his heart. We refrain from imposing cost. The instant petition is dismissed," the bench said.
Bali had questioned the Supreme Court's 1958 verdict in a matter relating to ban on slaughter of animals of species of bovine cattle. The apex court had then dealt with the constitutional validity of Bihar Preservation and Improvement of Animals Act 1955, UP Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act 1955 and CP and Berar Animal Preservation Act, 1949.
The petitioner, however, said this is not a correct order.
To this, the bench increased the amount of demand draft to Rs 50,000.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content