A vacation bench of Justices P C Pant and D Y Chandrachud also pulled up the petitioner, who had sought 100 per cent cut in the water supply to the state liquor industry, for having approached the apex court "just for the sake of publicity".
"The Bombay High Court has already passed an interim order in this regard. Why are you coming against an interim order of the high court? The high court has already allowed a 60 per cent cut, now what do you want? These are all policy decisions. There has to be a balance," the bench said.
To this, the bench said, "These are all policy decisions and the court's interference will be like taking over governance."
It said, "Even the 60 per cent cut has no basis. There can be no justification. These are all policy decisions and the courts cannot interfere in all these matters."
Also Read
The apex court finally asked the counsel for the petitioner to withdraw the plea and termed it as dismissed as withdrawn.
The court, however, granted Kale the liberty to approach the high court.
The plea filed in the apex court had sought that instead of a curtailed water supply, there should be no supply at all as the entire region is facing acute water shortage.
It had said that people were dying in the region due to the shortage of water and there is a limited water stock available.
People were being deprived of drinking water as it is being given to the liquor industry, it had said.